Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 15:09
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Fifth measles case in Georgia confirmed in family member of person with earlier case - 11Alive.com
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sixers mock draft roundup 9.0: VJ Edgecombe closing in on being No. 3 overall pick - PhillyVoice
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What is your biggest mistake or regret?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
This Is How To Make Your Brain Act 4 Years Younger, According To Science - MindBodyGreen
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What would TERFs do if there weren't such a thing as being transgender? Who would be their target?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What was your most embarrassing wardrobe malfunction in public?